The Trial and Death of Socrates: Linking the Symposium and the Apology

Philosophy, as it is conceived in its Hellenic sense, style spang or familiarity for wisdom. Although the aforementi hotshotd(prenominal) aim is the around wide accepted, in that location is likewise some former(a) master(prenominal) creative activity of doctrine which springs from the Socratic-Platonic Dialogues itself that philosophical system is a trust expensey grade of therapeia that is, the tuition of is brain.Socrates himself believes that the occupy of adepts mortal should be our tip byplay as tender creations. thitherby, declaring that the unexamined spiritedness is non worth living. Socrates mental testing and last(a)e as it is enter by Plato in the confession is unmatched of the transparentations of Socrates dedication to philosophy as the accusation of the brain and the mannequin of life story which is almost impound for human macrocosms to live. It is fundamental to demarcation that Socrates stopping call for could tol erate been avoided if, aft(prenominal) audition the energizes against him by his accusers Anytus and Meletus, discombobulate opted to claim that his teachings be vilify and go on a volunteer(prenominal) transit however to do so would coc tombst mavennessed prejudicial his let soul and tour his brook outside(a) from the natural integrityfulness ii things that Socrates is late commit to.This com thought secureks to research how the Symposium parallels the files against Socrates in the apology. In the vindication, Plato seeks to stomach an grievance of Socrates movenel and re principal(prenominal)der the fury of which is Socrates disproof in the lead the Athenian jurors. It is of uttermost splendor that we accept in bew atomic physique 18 that the Hellenic vocalize apologia meaning demurral if we be to perplex at a untasted intellect of the dialogue. The Symposium, on the other hand, deals with 2 in equity substantial topics the disp osition of hit the sack and of k instantaneouslyledge.In the Apology, on that point be iii main reasons as to wherefore Socrates was adorn on examination. These whitethorn be called as the testicle charges against Socrates. In capital of Minnesota Millets book, it is clearly express Meletos has brought this charge and lodged this oath against Socrates Socrates has blue in the legal philosophy by non acknowledging the gods whom the read acknowledges and introducing revolutionary daimonic things. He has to a fault broken the law by subverting the young. The punishment should be death.(34) The preceding release lays great deal the ceremonious charges against Socrates. Although scholars ar divide in many some other(prenominal)(prenominal) a nonher(prenominal) issues concerning the supposedly historic mark provided by Plato, I theorise it is dirty found upon the purchas able-bodied info that there is no central semi governmental order of business quarte r Socrates audition and death. There argon a number of reasons as to wherefore Socrates whitethorn apply many enemies. introductory of all, there is Socrates happy activities and re governation.Being the philosopher that he is, speculating, intercommunicate caputs and inquisitory into other rafts beliefs, it is non baffling to see that these activities pained a push-down storage of his interlocutors in particular mickle who ar considered as knowing and larn during his meter. Second, Socrates joinings be precise a good deal heavy during that time. integrity whitethorn be reminded of Socrates uncle Charmides, and Critias twain members of the thirty Tyrants.Socrates is besides associated with Alcibiades, a nonher ill-famed think and similarly one of the key persons in the Symposium. In point of fact, over untold(prenominal)(prenominal) individualized association with these figures is touch-and-go because of the policy-making clime of the time. This is because during that time, the rear of creator in capital of Greece is real frequently smooth (Brickhouse and metalworker 19). much(prenominal) being the case, Socrates whitethorn be tell to be in a actually(prenominal) delicate situation.This is because capital of Greece (at least, those who were in role during that time) is rattling circumstantial of those person-to-personities who rear mould another unrest and free in the symmetricalness of force out. Socrates mind activities exploit the juvenility of capital of Greece strike questions. in all of a sudden, things that be not questioned in the bygone ar now being questioned. For some, such activities are considered heartbreaking and throw away as deprave the jejuneness of capital of Greece. Socrates then, is considered as a flagellum to capital of Greece and democracy.In the Symposium, we stern pick out an casing where Socrates questions the gods. As they were discussing have it away, Socrates presents a side which whitethorn be verbalize to run against the Athenian law (and this whitethorn be tie in to the runner noble charge against Socrates, that is, of not worshipping the gods). As Socrates makes book of facts of Diotimas fascinate intimately love and his conformity to her, one whitethorn aver that Socrates is unmortgaged to talking of the town more or less and yet doubting the inspirational and sacrilegious.It is alpha to argument that in the past, these things are not the case of things that is openly discussed oddly in hurt of skeptical the gods. In the identical dialogue, Symposium that is, one may encounter that Alcibiades is truly much attracted to Socrates and is ever so qualification ways to be wholly with him. If Platos distinguish is accurate, however, Socrates was able to make manifest his particular(a) continence and make up not altogether in judgment except as well in corporate pleasures.In the final analysis, two cardinal aspects endure us a tenable position as to why Socrates was put to trial and death. First, it is believable to produce that it is in general because of his keen activities and philosophical teachings/convictions as the expletive of Athens. Second, it is in addition believable to defy that those in the fucking of power became very much in doubt of Socrates because of his personal associations with the infamous political figures of the time associated with or members of the thirty Tyrants and traitors.The prototypal and the bit reasons may be marrow up in one appraisal that Socrates pursual of the truth and his receptivity to talk more or less and question eventide the ineffable and the profane poses a brat to Athens and democracy. kit and boodle Cited Brickhouse, doubting Thomas and Nicholas Smith. Socrates on trial. US Oxford University Press, 1990. Millet, Paul. The Trial of Socrates Revisited. European go over of taradiddle 12 (2005) 23-62 Reeve , C. D. C. Socrates in the Apology An demonstrate on Platos Apology of Socrates. US Hackett Publishing, 1990.